Google Books

 

With innovative technology created in what seems like daily, the demographic of library users also begins to change to “Digital Natives” (Rodenby). I believe libraries should continue to evolve with technology to serve the digital community.

Enter Google Books, which has been around for some time, and since 2004 along with partner libraries made millions of scanned digital copies of books to be easily searched through (“Google”). It seemed to me that it would be copyright infringement, however the U.S. 2^nd Circuit Court of Appeals did not see it that way. The court ruled it was “fair use” because Google Books only used text from the scanned books to create an easy search for similar text sources (Google). Compared to searching with only keywords, Google Books lets you search using terms and provides you “snippets” of books, but even Google Books has restrictions.

A benefit for the library partner is Google Books provides them with a scanned digitized copy of the physical book (Koonce). Some libraries have begun creating their digitized collections, and it takes time, money, and labor to complete. 

Works Cited

Carter, Dave. “Google Scanning @ AAEL.” Flickr, Jan. 19,2008, https://flic.kr/p/4mGhNM

"Google, books and 'fair use'." Los Angeles Times, Apr 19, 2016. ProQuest, https://login.ezproxy.palomar.edu/login?auth=shibboleth&url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/google-books-fair-use/docview/1781719213/se-2.

Koonce, Lance. "Another page in the Google books saga: appeals court blesses mass digitization project as fair use." Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, Feb. 2016, pp. 20+. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A442782069/OVIC?u=cclc_palomar&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=4a63b6c7. Accessed 13 May 2024.

Rodenby, Thomas. “Insider’s Perspective. (Cover Story).” Information Today, vol. 36, no. 3, Apr. 2019, pp. 8–9. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=135938356&site=ehost-live&scope=site.Evaluation