With innovative
technology created in what seems like daily, the demographic of library users
also begins to change to “Digital Natives” (Rodenby). I believe libraries
should continue to evolve with technology to serve the digital community.
Enter
Google Books, which has been around for some time, and since 2004 along with
partner libraries made millions of scanned digital copies of books to be easily
searched through (“Google”). It seemed to me that it would be copyright
infringement, however the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals did not
see it that way. The court ruled it was “fair use” because Google Books only
used text from the scanned books to create an easy search for similar text sources
(Google). Compared to searching with only keywords, Google Books lets you
search using terms and provides you “snippets” of books, but even Google Books
has restrictions.
A
benefit for the library partner is Google Books provides them with a scanned
digitized copy of the physical book (Koonce). Some libraries have begun creating
their digitized collections, and it takes time, money, and labor to complete.
Works
Cited
"Google,
books and 'fair use'." Los Angeles Times, Apr 19, 2016.
ProQuest,
https://login.ezproxy.palomar.edu/login?auth=shibboleth&url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/google-books-fair-use/docview/1781719213/se-2.
Koonce, Lance.
"Another page in the Google books saga: appeals court blesses mass
digitization project as fair use." Intellectual Property &
Technology Law Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, Feb. 2016, pp. 20+. Gale In
Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A442782069/OVIC?u=cclc_palomar&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=4a63b6c7.
Accessed 13 May 2024.
Rodenby, Thomas.
“Insider’s Perspective. (Cover Story).” Information Today, vol. 36,
no. 3, Apr. 2019, pp. 8–9. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=135938356&site=ehost-live&scope=site.Evaluation